Posted 1/23/12
Posted 1/19/12
Posted 1/9/12
Posted 2/14/12
Posted 2/14/12
Posted 2/14/12
Posted 2/14/12
Posted 2/14/12
Posted 2/14/12
Posted 2/14/12
Posted 2/13/12
Posted 2/13/12
Posted 2/13/12
Posted 2/17/09 3:10 pm ET by Larry Carroll in News
When I caught up with the legendary Ridley Scott last week, I was there to discuss his âAlienâ character Ellen Ripley being named one of our âTop 10 Movie Badasses of All Time ."
While I was there, however, I couldnât resist running over a few other key projects that could become his next classic. âI am in a constant stage of development,â he told me in a conference room of his Scott Free Productions office. âI am liable to do âGucci.â I am liable to do a thing called âChild 44,â and I am doing âRobin Hoodâ next.â
That statement is notable, not only in that those first two projects are moving forward, but that âNottinghamâ has now officially been renamed to reflect its lead character. âOh yes, I think we are just going to call it âRobin Hoodâ,â Scott revealed. âWe start in almost 2 months.â
In an attempt to clarify all the confusion from a few months ago about Russell Crowe playing multiple roles, Scott was eager to say that he had changed his mind, and that Crowe will simply portray the famed archer who rises from an unlikely background. âRobin Hood is in the army of Richard Coeur de Lion,â he said of how weâll find the character early in the film âHe is a bowman in the army of Richard Coeur de Lion.â
â[Crowe as both Robin and the Sheriff of Nottingham] was an idea so far back, way back when at the time I had this proposed to me, and I read it and thought, âI donât really know what it does for it, but itâs alrightâ,â Scott recalled of the now-abandoned idea. âIt is better to simply have the evolution of a character called Robin Hood, who will come out of a point in the Crusades which is the end.â
As a result, in Scottâs film the Sheriff will be âless important; the Sheriff of Nottingham is always a kind of an amusing character in most of the movies, who represents the hierarchy in the story at that point,â Scott explained. âThe hierarchy and the wealthy always ruled over the under class, and fundamentally that doesnât change, because Robin Hood is actually the person who finally - in terms of the overall classical idea of the film - will help the poor, probably taking from the rich.â
So, rather than the Robin-vs.-Sheriff showdowns weâve come to expect from âRobin Hoodâ movies, Scott has instead employed the history of the time to make an entire country the villain. âIt is from France. It is the French,â he insisted. âThe villain is much bigger in that sense; much more important, and much more dangerous.â
â[In] 1066 Harold II went against William the Conqueror. Harold took an arrow in his eye, and William the Conqueror took over England, and so France owned everything right through,â Scott explained of the turmoil of that age. âEven to the extent of changing the architecture of the churches from Anglo-Saxon to Roman, thatâs French; they changed the arches in the churches.â
And speaking of physical changes: While some have questioned whether Russell Crowe can ditch his âBody of Liesâ gut and lose enough weight to play Robin Hood, Ridley says itâs not a problem. âOh that is silly; all that stuff is bullsh-t,â Scott insisted. âHe is going to be totally fit. That is not a problem at all.â
âAnd heâs been working on his bow and arrow for about 4 months,â Scott revealed. âHe sends me tapes of him hitting targets at about 45 meters. Heâs pretty good!â
Do you think Scott and Crowe can team up to make the best âRobin Hoodâ yet? What do you think of his story ideas?
Posted 1/31/12
Posted 1/30/12
Posted 1/30/12
Posted 6/20/11
Posted 1/23/11
Posted 1/23/11
Comments