Posted 1/23/12
Posted 1/19/12
Posted 1/9/12
Posted 2/13/12
Posted 2/13/12
Posted 2/13/12
Posted 2/13/12
Posted 2/13/12
Posted 2/10/12
Posted 2/10/12
Posted 2/10/12
Posted 2/10/12
Posted 2/10/12
Posted 2/12/09 3:18 pm ET by Eric Ditzian in News
One man who will not be coming to save âWall Streetâ is Oliver Stone. Last fall, as the economic situation went from bad to straight up scary, Fox announced it was fast-tracking development of a sequel to the directorâs 1987 classic about ruthless businessmen in shiny suits. Now, in an exclusive interview with MTV News, Stone revealed he will have nothing to do with the project.
âI dropped out,â he said. âI didnât want to do another âWall Streetâ movie. I think everything I had to stay came through.â
There was a time, however, when he and fellow scriptwriter Stanley Weiser discussed picking up the story again. âWe invested this a while ago,â Stone said, âbut we couldnât come up with the right way to go about it. I think thereâs an interesting movie to be made in there. Iâm just not interested because itâs so complex now. I donât think people can understand security derivatives. But these types of people [on Wall Street] -- essentially itâs the same mentality.â
One project that Stone is sticking by is âPinkville,â a feature about the 1968 My Lai massacre in Vietnam, which was set to film with Bruce Willis, Woody Harrelson and Cam Gigandet until the writersâ strike interrupted development in late 2007. ââPinkvilleâ is not dead,â Stone said of what would be his fourth film about that war. âI own it. I could activate it again. I donât know if the time is right now with the Iraq War still going on, but I love that project and itâs an important one. My Lai is a forgotten piece of history thatâs crucial to remember. You never know, these things come alive.â
For now, however, the Oscar-winning director has no definite plans to jump back into a feature film after last Octoberâs Bush biopic âWâ (out now on DVD) and is instead focusing on a pair of documentaries. The smaller of the two centers on Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez, while the larger one remains shrouded in mystery.
âItâs on the concept of history,â Stone said. âI donât want to talk about it too much. This is not Ken Burns style. This is not America first, ethno-centric stuff. This is about the serious, objective view of the place of empire.â
Both documentaries were financed abroad and conceived to play on the small screen. But Stone is skeptical that either one will ever cross airwaves or cable lines in the States. âItâs not necessarily made for American television,â he said. âEventually they might find their way to DVD here. But MTV might show it -- you never know! MTV History will come in. Talk to your bosses.â
Is âWall Streetâ without Stone sacrilegious? What about without Michael Douglas (not yet signed on) or Charlie Sheen (reportedly not involved)? And should Stone have an opportunity to show his documentaries on American television?
Posted 1/31/12
Posted 1/30/12
Posted 1/30/12
Posted 6/20/11
Posted 1/23/11
Posted 1/23/11
Comments