‘The Chronicles of Naria’: The Problem of Susan Pevensie - Discuss!

Susan PevensieIt seems clear that whether or not you view Susan Pevensie as a victim or a fool, chances are you don’t take a middle-ground approach — not when she’s been alternately called a manifestation of author C.S. Lewis’s misogynic beliefs, and a representation of the Narnian Judas (as in, you know, THE Biblical traitor).

But however you view Susan’s ultimate exclusion from Aslan’s Country (which we’ll just go ahead and call heaven from here on out) — whether you stand with author Philip Pullman and say it’s because of sexist reasons (”She’s interested in nothing now-a-days except nylons and lipstick and invitations”) or whether you side with close readers and more mainstream scholars, who say it’s because she was in too much of a hurry to adopt a materialistic mentality (”She’s always a jolly sight too keen on being grown up.”) — you’re going to wind up with a headache after watching “Prince Caspian.”

That’s because the new movie posits both.

Susan, who we won’t see again in any Narnia films, is still the last one to accept and see Aslan, she’s still maternal and adult. But she’s also involved in a budding romance with Prince Caspian, a non-canonical addition that the filmmakers added to the screenplay.

(Click here to read about how the filmmakers and stars defended that choice.)

Whether or not you as a fan agree with the choice, however, is less interesting to me than whether or not you think it colors your perceptions of Susan. If you hadn’t read the novels, would the romance make you side more with one side or the other by the time we get to “Last Battle”? Does Susan, in your mind, ever get into Heaven? (Lewis himself claimed before his death that her story wasn’t done).

And, finally, what do you make of her ultimate tragedy? Is she a victim or a fool? Sound off below.

71 Responses to “‘The Chronicles of Naria’: The Problem of Susan Pevensie - Discuss!”

Pages: [1] 2 »

  1. victim---the books have always unsettled me...her flaws are so seemingly innocence (though I understand their symbolic representations) I always found it rather unfair. Truly, I think Lewis was just appeasing fans with his comments that her story wasn't done...he was trying to make a solid case against poor Susan. I am not sure how the romance will color the subject...on the way hand it may paint her as even more shallow, or it could add a level of sympathy to her character that is lacking in the books (who hasn't been young and in love?). I guess I will find out this weekend...either way her departure signals mine from the series.
  2. ummm... tough one especially since it's been a while since i've read the books but i think that if Susan was ever really happy with being a grown up then that's her choice. I've alaways had the feeling she was more comfortable getting married and having children, blossoming the maternal side of her, and if that dosn't get her into Heaven then what is Heaven all about anyways?!?! the romance... i dunno..It definately wasn't in Lewis' vision and in non of ours but it may bring something extra to the plot which may attract mor viewers (if that is what they were hoping to) but that isn't really necessary.We'll see!
  3. Susan is a victim because if you read the last battle she is not on the platform or the train. Susan is left all alone. Also she is to grown up for her age and that is her problem. Also thelove interest with Prince Caspian might be interesting.
  4. She definitely doesn't represent some sort of sexism on Lewis' part--at least as far as I could tell--and I've loved and re-read the Narnia books hundreds of times. And as to whether or not she gets into heaven, well, at the end of "The Last Battle" she isn't seen on the other side of the stable door, nor does she go into Aslan's country...but I've always felt that it was because she wasn't in the accident that killed the rest of the Pevensies (including their parents). Yes, she is jolly keen on growing up, but I think that merely means not that she has rejected Aslan (or Christ), but that she has become too grown up to remember her adventures in Narnia. As Mr. Tumnus points out to Lucy, there are connections between Aslan's world (which is the real Narnia) and all the "real" worlds (including our own), so who is to say that Susan won't someday show up? I for one, don't believe she ever was truly 'lost,' and think Lewis left it deliberately vague. She's no Judas, she's no apostate. She's just a typical teenage girl--a little crazy, a little mixed-up, and altogether wonderful.
  5. The "romance" makes absolutely NO sense either in terms of Caspian's character or Susan's arc.

    Susan does end up in Heaven, it's just that it's the Earth Heaven rather than the Narnia one. Dsm is right in saying it's a choice of worlds she's made. Her polemical role for Lewis is in encouraging kids who read the book not to grow up too fast, and of course this kiss scene is totally contrary to that, since it's tacit approval of growing up fast.

    As for Caspian, it doesn't fit with him at all. He has a wife in his future, who dies tragically. That's a big part of the motivation behind The Silver Chair, and it's cheapened by him getting hot for Susan.

    What's he going to be doing in The Voyage of the Dawn Treader? Asking Lucy, "So where's that hot sister of yours?" "Oh, she grew up too fast and stopped believing in Narnia. So she now thinks you were a sexual fantasy and has no feelings for you at all" "Well... I'm totally devastated, but at the same time, you're looking sexy. How about some on-board romance, before I get married to Ramandu's daughter? Got to sow my oats, you know!"

    Basically it's cheap Hollywood bullsh*t that totally undermines the integrity of the characters and the story.
  6. Her maternal insitics are not what come into play here, and if we are into quoting the Bible- Susan plays more of a Martha, of the Martha who cooked all day rather than sitting at Jesus' feet. While there is nothing inherently wrong about this, or in Susan's case, choosing nylons and lipsticks over Narnia, making priorities of what now over what is real costs her in The Last Battle.
    Susan is not "left behind", because, if you remember, if she had been with the others at Prof. Cornelius's house, belonging to those who believe in Narnia and follow Aslan, then she would have been on the train platform, and would not have been left. This was her decision.
    Susan does not play a traitor- or Judas, as you call her- but the sad represenation of reality for those who choose to forget what they know to be true, in favour of what is tangible and real right now. It is this perception that makes Susan lose out. She is not evil, and the rest are good. She has been misguided, and has forgotten, but it was her own choice. CS Lewis was slightly sexist- but not in this area of literature. In fact, he was spot on. Our fascination with the here and now limits our ability to see beyond our eyesight, into "Narnia" or "Aslan's Country."

    And as to the relationship- CS Lewis was writing for children, which is why none is mentioned, but I don't see a problem. I think it will be interesting, but if they try to make too much of it, pumpin the hottie prince up for his looks rather than integrity, and all those good Narnian values, this is a cheap shot at trying to get more people in seats. If not, then it should be fine.
  7. I've already seen the movie, and the romance doesn't cheapen anyone's story arc and isn't really at the forefront of the storyline. The romance is a really lovely addition and isn't some sexual teen thing at all...
  8. How old are Susan and Caspian in the book? I didn't think they were actually in their late teens. At the end of LWW when they go back to Earth, they return to their ages and then a year later go back to Narnia for the second book. I though Susan was 14 or 15 and Caspian the same.
    That's not an age where romance is impossible or odd, but also not an age where the director's arguement that it was unnatural that they didn't express attraction makes much sense. I agree with Rocky and Rach that it's a cheap movie-selling tactic.
    Susan always seemed silly to me while I was growing up, but since I've re-read the books as an adult, I do think that Susan represents a lot of what C.S. Lewis had trouble dealing with in his ideas of the female gender. He was a bachelor for so much of his life and his wife died so soon after they married that I don't think he ever really thought much of women in general. I do think he was sexist although a wonderful thinker and writer.
  9. I hated that they would put the kiss between prince Caspian and Susan in. When I found out about it, the feeling was exactly equivalent to the feeling you would have if you had found a precious diamond, been told that it had no flaws, and later found out it had a flaw, and was worth nothing. I hope they do not put any more romance in than is necessary. I don't know how Douglas Gresham let this get past him.
  10. I saw the movie, "Prince Caspian," tonight. The not-in-the-book kiss between Prince Caspian and Susan was clearly shoe-horned into the movie, where it absolutely did not belong. The "glances" which the movie producers said preceded the kiss and made the kiss appropriate were few and entirely lacking in chemistry. The kiss was merely a unsubtle commercial ploy to increase viewership of the movie by teenage girls. Prince Caspian, by the way, was certainly beautiful to watch, but displayed minimal warmth, no humor, and only slight personality. Queen Susan would expect more in anyone to whom she was attracted.
  11. Im a diehard Narnian but have a change of heart with Caspian and Susan.....I am so rooting for them now.....the last time I rallied for a couple so fanatically were Mulder and Scully of XFiles and Ross and Rachel of Friends and all couples came true.
  12. Much of what I wanted to say has been said, So I'll add only one thing more. Susan's not inclusion of the last battle did not exclude here from Aslan's Country (heaven) for he himself said at the end of the Voyage of the Dawn Treader: "There is a way into My country from All the worlds." Susan's choices to become more attached to the "real" world meant she would take a longer time learning what was really important. She failed to grasp that by knowing Aslan (Christ) for a little in Narnia, She could learn to know Him better from their own World. She will see Him again, but not yet...
  13. i thought the movie was great but wat i want to talk about is the end of the series, seeing the actres playing susan now i cant believe she didnt go to aslaans land (heaven( it ruins it and i DEMAND some one make a sequelon c.s lewis's behalf!!!!
    or else
  14. please excuse my bad typing i was in a hurry,
    but someone should write a sequel describing wat happened to susan after the last battle its too sad to leave her like that without a happy ending
    and dont make it like the problam with susan , it was WAY too adult make it for the same age range as c.s lewis's masterpieces...

    please!!
  15. I've read the Narnia books 11 times and have wanted to write a sequel telling Susan's story for years (I'm a freelance writer). While the romance in the movie felt unnatural, it did offer another reason for Susan to grieve the loss of Narnia - but she had plenty of reasons by the end of Prince Caspian. To reign for 15 years as a queen and lose it all in a few steps must have been devastating. Then she went back and everything was changed, and she finds at the bitter end that she will never return.

    Then, she is separated from everyone else who knows Narnia for a time. Edmund and Lucy go to the Scrubbs and Peter studies with Professor Kirke, while Susan goes to America with her parents. Narnia seems more like a dream every day, and she has no one to talk to about it. To cope with her grief, she denies what she knows to be true.

    But she can't deny it forever. I believe Susan does make it to Aslan's Country. The loss of her entire family would shake her to the core and open her eyes. And if Aslan went to such lengths to rescue Edmund, Eustace, and others, would he do any less for Susan?
  16. Mikey V. said: "Susan’s not inclusion of the last battle did not exclude here from Aslan’s Country (heaven) for he himself said at the end of the Voyage of the Dawn Treader: “There is a way into My country from All the worlds.” Susan’s choices to become more attached to the “real” world meant she would take a longer time learning what was really important. She failed to grasp that by knowing Aslan (Christ) for a little in Narnia, She could learn to know Him better from their own World. She will see Him again, but not yet…"

    We are told whether Susan turns back to "what was really important" or not. If you read The Last Battle very carefully, the reason she is not there is NOT because she is permanently excluded. It is because she was not in the accident (in our world) which sent everyone else to Heaven. The "friends of Narnia" were going to a meeting to talk about their Narnia experiences, and she was more interested in her social life than the stories of Narnia. If I were to write an eighth story (which probably should be left unwritten) I would start it with the funeral of her siblings, and follow her return to the things of Aslan (Christ). Maybe if Last Battle is made into a move, they could end it with the funeral, and Susan asking the priest if she could talk with him. That's what I'd like to see, anyway.
    As far as the Susan/Caspian thing--I think it was appropriate and well done.
  17. I agree with Deborah. Lewis' depiction of Susan has a lot to do with his misunderstandings of the female gender. It is possible to like "lipstick and nylons" and still be a soulful, spiritual person. I can't blame him; living in a male dominated world and not really having any women in his life, but it does present a rather limiting view of women. His pictures of femininity are confused: Jill, Polly, Aravis and Lucy, all have tomboyish streaks. Aravis in fact goes so far as to dress as a man. On the other hand, the more feminine women are either incomplete, as Ramandu's daughter is (the fact that she remains nameless through two books is rather significant), or utterly silly. Lasaraleen is the queen of lipstick and nylons, Calormene-style and she is utterly vapid. Lewis tries to add some femininity to Lucy's character, when on the Dawn Treader she's lying in bed looking at all the cool things she got in the Lone Islands, but the comment seemed very out of place.

    As for Susan and Caspian, having seen the movie I think it does no harm to the book. I actually really liked the addition. It does make sense, and one thing that Lewis also didn't understand was romance. All two of the canon romances are very abrupt. Despite the fact that Caspian seems to have found his soul mate in Lucy, he sees Ramandu's daughter, and is essentially like "hubba hubba." I love the Chronicles dearly, but I certainly don't think that Lewis was a perfect writer. However, one thing I like is that he leaves room for us to imagine our own stories about Narnia, to color in the details. The romance between Caspian and Susan is exactly that. Besides which, I don't see what's so terrible about romance. The relationship between Caspian and Susan was lovely because it was so innocent--there was nothing tawdry about it, and since when has romance become a horrible thing?

    Furthermore, I'm a big believer in the idea that it's not just the author's intent which makes a story, but the reader's interpretation. What the reader sees is just as valid as what the author writes, and so if Lewis didn't intend for certain things to be in his books but a reader sees them anyway, as long as those ideas don't directly contradict what's already in the books it's a valid interpretation. Imo.
  18. I would question Caspian's manhood if he didnt have an attraction towards Susan. I shake the man's hand and if I were him I would do more than kissing. Anna Popplewell as many of my buddies and myself saw is blossoming into a hot WOMAN.
    Even the women in my family saw she's all grown up and think they are sizzling and a perfect fit together.
  19. This so reminds me of LOTR Viggo and Liv Tyler diehards coming hard on Arwen and Arragorn why Arwen's part was bigger blah blah blah. Same with Batman Begins and The Dark Knight diehards crying foul that Catwoman and Talia have always been Batman's love interests but the filmmakers created a special character Rachel Dawes for the movies so out of the Batman myth. I love Susan and Prince Caspian. In fact bring it on!!!!!!
    I was so depress that this two could not be together and the audiences the night I saw the movie were all chanting " KISS KISS KISS".
    The movie got it right and it was heartbreakingly romantic.
  20. Im not familiar with the book at all but Im well aware that Hollywood always makes changes to most of the books turn movies. I had no issues with the romantic subplot. Im a warm fuzzy kind of fan so I was sad that I didnt get my happy ending or happy beginning for Prince Caspian and Susan.

    Its a Disney trademark so it like a copout that they didnt have a shot of love and happiness.
  21. I really don't understand adults much because I'm not one. But I do know that love is NOT a crime. Can't some of these adults remember how it was like in their teens? Because I know they would have SOME memories of their teen love(s). And anyway, I thought the "romance" was beautiful. I read the book and it seemed out of shape. Prince Caspian really dosen't seem to have anything to do with Lucy or Susan. I think the romance in it brought the girls more into the story. I also read the Last Battle. My favorite character in Narnia was Susan,but she didn't really make it to the end which made me really dissapointed. The book to me really has no fun in it for us teens. And if the book is for kids I really don't know if they'd understand the story because when I read it when I was younger it kind of confused/bore me. And then I read it a few days before the movie so I could "refresh" my mind. After I read the book I thought the movie would also be pretty out of shape. But when I saw the movie it drove me to another direction. IT was NOT good. It was the BOMB!!! Me and my friends enjoyed the movie WAY more than the book and I know for sure it's because part of the romance. But it kind of brings me to a conclusion... what's gonna happen to the other movie, The Dawn Treader? I just hope the director also changes that movie at least a little bit and if he makes another movie of Narnia, I just hope he'll make a sequel to it. A story of Prince Caspian and Susan reunited. Or at least put Susan in. I just wish the WHOLE family would reunite in Narnia. I just wanted to give (some)adults the point of view of a teen of the movie and the book.(Even if I wasn't as practical as they were of the movie)
  22. The caspian/susan kiss and flirting was the worst thing they could've done to the Chronicle. Caspian was not even that old in the book, and he regarded the Kings and Queens with reverence and awe. They really blew it here. Of course people who defend this think it was appropriate because they are teens and good looking and all that. Yes, that is if you are a high school modern day kid. But the books were written with a set of values that most people have now forgotten and/or think old fashion.
    That kiss was so disrespectful to the spirit of the books and the message that Lewis wanted to convey: That old values are worth adhering to at any cost.
  23. My Ice queen heart was melted with the warmness of Barnes and Popplewell onscreen.
  24. "Our kids are growing up. Caspian's a very fine-looking young man. Why wouldn't there be some romance? Just look at the two of them, It seemed more unnatural not to have the attraction than to have it. I don't think it's over the top." -andrew adamson.

    I agree with Andrew. Why should Susan and Caspian have some sort of 'thing'. And really, It's not like it was that big of a plot in the first place was it? And in my opinion, it made the movie better, it definatly brought a tear to my eye.

    "They're in their adolescence," Barnes added. "People shouldn't be embarrassed or upset about it because it's not on Page 79 of the book." - Ben Barnes

    Now, Ben there is ALSO right. We as Narnia fans shouldn't make such a huge thing out of something like this. I mean, think about it, honestly now, why shouldn't Caspian have a crush, or vise versa? After all they're only human.

    I'd like to finish my argument off here with another Andrew quote:

    "Susan's story is that it's better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all."
  25. Three words: I.LOVE.IT.

    I echo the song lyrics of Regina Spektor. Its so suits Caspian and Susan and how many audiences feel. "I'll come back...you'll just call me....no need to say goodbye".

    I tried to pretend Im not crying in the theatre because my brothers will bully me but it just tugged at my heartstrings because this changes is indeed way better than the book. I want Susan to be happy and now Im having a switcheero feeling wanting them together. I want Caspian marrying Susan instead of his future wife. I dont even feel like watching the next installments with M.I.A. Susan. Major kudos to TPTB and I heart what Adamson,Barnes and Popplewell said.
  26. well it seems i sparked quite a discussion,
    i guess it wasnt that bad and the reason i didnt like it was because it shows the first signs of what will inevitably happen to susan , and i hate that becauase i loved susan in the books and i loved her on screen (anna popplewell was THE BEST CHOICE) and seeing anna popplewell onscreen , so innocent and pure really capturing susan (on and off stage) gave me hope that maybe she could be saved.
    oh, im 15 by the way so im a teen too J.S

    p.s "the problem with susan" is disgusting and ruins all that is right with the chronicles of narnia (aslans and the white whitch killing susan and lucy then getting it on)
    i seriously wanted to destroy the monitor and projectile vomit into a waste paper basket.


    thanx for all your opinions earlier, they opened my eyes. =]
  27. oops i meant H.J not J.S
    sorry
    =[

    ben
  28. oops sorry, i meant H.S not J.S
    my friend (james stewart : J.S)
    was talking to me
  29. if only if only (the woodpecker cried) C.S Lewis was still alive then i would BEG him to write a conclusion to susans stroy then i would be at peace, but if he meant to leave it unwritten so that people would ponder, quetion, and discuss the possible outcomes and theories then the fact that we are all here discussing, being brought together by a single factor in the whole series, then i guess he succeeded...

    but i still want him to write another one,
    pehaps if i go to "aslans county" i will ask him

    p.s i meant H.J not J.S sorry
  30. i keep repeating what i say by accident because of a bug, i fix soon
    sorry
  31. could every one please state ussually when they reply on this forum so i (and everyone else) know when to check it
    please
    thanx
    ben =]
  32. I like the movie version better than the book. This feels more like the real girl power and Susan is the real deal and would have been the perfect soulmate for Prince Caspian. Looks like the movie vindicated a lot because I read the NY Times and they reported that Andrew Adamson was so nervous how the audience will be reacting to Susan and Caspian but it was all happy AAWWSSS all around. Now many fanfics are written on Susan and Caspian by fans and cries and petitions to get Susan back for the next movies.
  33. Im already voting this for MTV's Best Kiss.

    Youtube has some clips of the kiss already and its generating lots of love and lots of hits.
  34. My friend H.J told me about the thing she wrote up there so I'm here to state MY opinion. I read the book before I saw the movie so I knew that susan and peter weren't gonna go back so i also knew that anna and william weren't gonna show up in other Narnia movies either so i was pretty dissapointed. when i saw the movie i was happy and sad at the same time! i was happy because i knew there would be another movie and sad because susan and caspian would never meet again. in the book it didnt really matter but after the romanace in the movie it did kind of matter. but actually after i thought about for awhile i thought,well susan knew she wouldn't see caspian anymore so why not kiss him? it wouldn't do any harm. so yea,she did it. i thought that was a good add to the story:)
    the said part in the book i think is that in the end you don't know what happens to susan. that's sooooo sad....
    :(
  35. Beautifully stated N.J. I love the changes in the movie because I dont wonna be left in limbo but I want closure. I get the message of Adamson and the actors about Susan and this relationship.
    The book didnt mesh well with me because its character assasination on my heroine Susan.

    Now I wish from the bottom of my heart the filmmakers rethink about Susan because I dont just want her missing in action just like that.
    I know Caspian marries Ramundu's daughter but the movie makes me so attached to Susan and Caspian instead.They must find a way to bring them together.
  36. i loved susan in the books and i still really want to see her again possibly in a sequel for the books??
    (im looking at you katie hart!!)
    please even if you dont publish it write the eighth book and send it to me (and probably every1 in this forum will want a copy, your ideas are great an we all want a bit of closure for susan (pehaps another way of getting to aslans county and metting her family)
    i know its alot to ask but please save my email, i dont check it that often but in a year or so when you finished PLEASE SEND ME A COPY!!
    if its the bomb maybe think about publishing it?

    that would be the perfect end to susans story, maybe by leaving the story open-ended C.C Lewis INTENDED for other writers to have a go at susan's conclusion

    i am forever grateful if you do.

    ben jenkins (narnian)
  37. GOD!! THIS IS SO ANNOYING!! i post a comment then it doesnt show!!! then i post it again in a different context because i cant remember exactly wat i said and it posts the one i tried to before then the second one after!!!

    >=[
  38. Count me in voting for them on MTV's Best Kiss. That's a good idea.
    In my universe since Caspin's wife will die so its Susan and him who will
    get their chance of love and eternal bliss.
  39. i really hope that would happen Gail,but as everybody knows, that would pretty much be impossible because it'll mess up the WHOLE story. i wish it would happen,i really do. but i know it won't because well... it just isnt in the book.
    =[
    but if they make it like that i would LOVE IT! even if they had to make a pretty new story.
  40. After I seen the movie, I immediately check what the reaction of others were... Reading some of the comments here, I knew I wasn't the only one. I think Prince Caspian and Susan are so-right for each other. It just saddens me so much that they can't ever be together. However, even if others here wished that the filmmakers will continue their love story in the movies, it wouldn't make any difference am afraid. It just wouldn't feel "so real" because in the first place - it is not in the books.
    In some ways, I must admit it annoys me a bit that they really have to put that sub-plot of romance between the two as this will feel like deceiving the viewers (especially those who doesn't know the story) into thinking that they really have ever that kind of romance.
    I find it funny (even agreeing a bit) regarding Rocky's comments here. Really "What’s he (Caspian) going to be doing in The Voyage of the Dawn Treader?". Really, I hope the filmmakers took note of that before including the subplot of Caspian and Susan. Yet, as i said, nonetheless the romance did brought warmth to the movie.
    Don't get me wrong. Watching their stolen glances with each other during the movie does make my heart melt and start rooting for the two to really end up together. But that's just it, it is not in the books.
    I wish if ever Ms.Katie Hart has the go-signal by CS Lewis partners or relatives for that matter to write a sequel, I hope she will make the character of Susan really happy in the end - in Prince Caspian's arms and meeting her family at last in Aslan Country...It is just too bad that CS. LEwis makes the story of Susan's character hanging (though somewhat I understand the point he's driving at for the young readers). But, then again, I think the young readers would always love happy endings. Be that as it may, he should have included Susan with her family joining Aslan in heaven.
    As for the movie, since they started the sub-plot of Prince Caspian-Susan brief romance, and since we know that we wouldn't see Susan again in the "The Voyage of the Dawn Treader", I wish the filmmakers include in the script: Prince Caspian asking Lucy and Edmund AT LEAST how's their sister, so that there will be some kind of continuity of the story left from the Prince Caspian movie. Showing that Prince Caspian DID thought of her after they parted...
  41. how about if ms.katie hart were to write a sequel (this is if she gets denied by C.S Lewis partners)
    but change the names (but tell us wwhich name represents who) and call it "book eight - susan"
    but dont actually call anyone by the names we no them by (to protect against lawsuits) this is like--- A GREAT IDEA!! stop talking, start writing

    please do it , we'll all back you up and say oh yeah we had a brainstorm itsa COMPLETELY original idea"....if anyone asks
    marie= susan
    john=edmund
    james=peter
    claire=lucy
    ect. like that

    go on i will spend forever trying to convince you.

    ben (narnian)

    you could make millions. =]


    DO IT!! (please?)

    everyone else will want you to (wont you guys/girls??)

    pouring on the pier pressure!!
  42. I would definetely LOVE a sequel like that. I just wish there was some sort of (happy) ending for susan. what did she do wrong? in prince caspian(the book) i know that she didn't want to believe in Aslan and was the last person to see him. they also said in the Last Battle "All she thinks about are nylons and lipstick." but as some people know, girls mature faster than boys. and that's just what happened to susan. is that a crime?
  43. C.S.Lewis probably had a Susan that broke his heart which made him bitter.j/k He remained single forever right? His female pov was a giant backward step for womankind. Im LOL to see how some fanatics go apedung with the twist in this movie when even Historical American and World events are twisted by filmmakers in Hollywood. The movie should take on a happy alternate happy path for Susan. I like the romance subplot of Caspian and Susan because its fresh and touching. The characters shine and the display of chemistry between Ben Barnes and Popplewell makes you root for them to defy the odds and remain together.
  44. Just as a quick note: CS Lewis did marry eventually, to a woman who had two boys. Doug Gresham, current producer of the movies, is one of those stepsons. The 5th book (in publishing order), the Horse and His Boy, is dedicated to them. Nevertheless, that wasn't until much later on in life. I wouldn't say that all of Lewis' women were poorly depicted. Let's face it, Lucy is pretty cool, as is Aravis. I think his views of femininity were just confused--very much so.

    Just as another point, I keep hearing this all over the place and it's irritating the crap out of me. Caspian is *not* younger than Susan in the books. He's *older* because in the chapter "Sorcery and Sudden Vengeance" when Peter and Edmund burst in, Peter notices a werewolf leaping on a a boy "about his own age." Those who think Caspian is younger have obviously watched the BBC series, but that wasn't exactly the pinnacle of accuracy.

    And lastly, about a simple *kiss* being totally against C.S. Lewis' morals--calm yourselves people. Lewis was no puritan. Even if he didn't know how to write romance, he certainly acknowledged its existence, and one could go so far as to say that Caspian and Ramandu's Daughter actually flirt in the end of Voyage of the Dawn Treader, to say nothing of Aravis and Shasta (Cor's) banter, which continues until the end of The Horse and His Boy, when they marry. Ergo a sweet, very romantic kiss between Caspian and Susan does not degrade the Chronicles in any way.
  45. I prefer Susan and Caspian than the romance movies I had to suffer watching with my girlfriend like What happens in Vegas and Maid of Honor.
  46. i just find it very depressing that susan will NEVER see caspian again...
    very sad...
    i really hope the producers of the movies (if they make a movie for the last battle) would make a makes-sense-and-is-very-good movie where susan meets her family again AND caspian and lives happily ever after...
    that'd be nice....
  47. i mean after the last battle movie(if they make it)
  48. After seeing the movie, I really wish Caspian and Susan could get together in the future. Perhaps the producers were hinting at this with Regina Spector's song "The Call"....I'll come back when you call me...no need to say goodbye.

    I really hope so!
  49. oh,i really love that song!!
    it's such a good song...
    and ill keep my hopes up for caspian and susan getting back together!!!
    let's keep our fingers crossed!!!
  50. This MTV complain by fans is so history because the Susan and Caspian fans now has a large cult following after the public has seen the movie.
    Did you see the eye sex and pure love and lust with the two? Poor them. Hurry with the Disney version for Susan and Caspian. C.S.Lewis who????
    I want the Susan and Caspian scenes on the DVD the one Ben Barnes is talking about.

Pages: [1] 2 »