‘Twilight’ Co-Star Rachelle Lefevre Talks Treetop Controversy

Rachelle LefevreIf it’s possible to create a riot in cyberspace, “Twilight” star Kristen Stewart may have done just that a few weeks ago, mentioning a scene in the upcoming movie in which “[Robert Pattinson as Edward] throws me over his back, right before he’s going to tell me that he’s a vampire, and then he runs over the treetops.”

Some 1,600 comments later, the debate rages on, over whether the scene strays too far from the book’s depiction. Naturally, when we landed the first-ever on-set “Twilight” interview with Stewart’s co-star Rachelle Lefevre, we had to get her thoughts on whether those treetops would be tweaking “Twilight” too much.

“There’s a scene where Edward reveals to Bella that he is a vampire, and he doesn’t just reveal that he’s a vampire, he reveals all that that encompasses,” Lefevre said of the script. “It’s almost a demonstration, and I think that scene is going to be amazing.”

The actress, who plays the vampire Victoria in the flick, added that the cast has spent the past few weeks training for such stunts. “I haven’t seen all of the stunts specifically, but I did see a setup of that while I was doing my wire work,” she revealed. “I would imagine that [Stewart's statement] is exactly what they are going to do.

“They’re talking like it’s really going to happen,” Lefevre added. “We did a rehearsal at one point where [director] Catherine [Hardwicke] was like, ‘They went up in the tree, but we’re not doing that today.’ I think we are really doing that.”

Before you post your comments below, Lefevre wants you to consider that the treetop-running thing does happen at other times in the “Twilight” series, even if not in the moment when Edward reveals himself.

“I think that there is a scene where a character ends up in a treetop in the book,” she explained. “I don’t want to say who, but there are treetop scenes in the book. But there are also things that are described in the book — the stunts that we are going to be doing, as far as I understand it, are very accurate to what’s in the book.

“You want to put as much action and excitement into the movie as possible,” Lefevre said of the controversy. “So sometimes things get heightened.”

So, twi-hards: What do you think?

754 Responses to “‘Twilight’ Co-Star Rachelle Lefevre Talks Treetop Controversy”

Pages: « 15 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 1516 »

  1. i wanna know who is jacob dammit!!!!!!!i know alot of girls like myself have been rooting for steven strait, but isn't he in the movie 10,000B.C.? i really hope under no matter what circunstances he gets the part for jacob!!!and i just recently checked on wikipedia(i know) that they casted the rest of the parts(EXCEPT JACOB) this includes angela weber, charlie, renee, and laurent
  2. i love Twilight very much, but i don't remember any tree-top scene in the trilogy.
    can someone fill me in? (page numbers, possibly?)
  3. Only Hollywood vampires levitate and Stephenie Meyer said that she didn't want them to be Hollywood vampires. It's just going to make Edward and the rest of the Cullen's look weird that they can fly through trees....
  4. pretty much the reason i think so many people are angry is because stephanie meyer had a dream one night of two people sitting in the meadow and wrote the ENTIRE series based on this dream so ruining that scene hurts more than other changes.
  5. I'm confused- there is a treetop scene or there isn't?

    I can't say I agree with all of the casting (Rachelle as Victoria is almost perfect, though), but I'm willing to give the movie a chance. There's a lot that movie make-up/magic can do, and great acting can help a ton. I just don't want them to rush through it! I could wait for a few years for a movie if I knew it was going to be awesome. I don't want it to be like Eragon (which in my opinion cut way too much, was way too short, and pretty much stunk).
  6. Hey guys.
    Okay, just to get things out of the way. For those who are upset about the treehopping, it's most likely because they're cutting out one of the most important scenes of the story and doing a complete 180. Do we care that theres treehopping added? Emphasizing on the ADDED, not the REPLACED. So go ahead and alter lines and scenes here and there, but the Port Angeles scene really starts the story, especially between Edward and Bella.
    All we're trying to say is, if we were to summarize the story, which means, talking about the most important points of the story which builds up to create something as unreal as twilight, the Port Angeles scene would most likely be mentioned. Hence, the problem isn't the treehopping, its the fact that that scene may be taken out. The reason why people are upset is because it's not just a scene where they're eating in the dining room or Bella is coooking for her dad orchanging her clothes, or something somewhat irrelevant to the story, which its difficult to say what is and isnt because evrything thats done is connected to the plot, it's because that one scene is like critical, important, it's where Edward and Bella's relationship begin blooming.
    So there.
  7. I aggree with all of you in baticular things and I dont know where Rachelle is getting her info because like Katie I have read each book several times and I dont recall any treetop running only running in the woods.

    P.S.Was she talking about Jacob going to Bella's room?
  8. I agree completly Jannel the Port Angeles scene is the beginging on the relation ship with Edward and Bella and if they cut that out in my opinon alot of fans who know and love the books will not be happy. In my opinon I will give this a chance and am super excited but Hiliary is right these books are Stephanie Meyer's dream and I dont wan't her dream destroyed like that.
    P.S.Love the cast choose.
  9. I can't wait!! I think this is going to be my favorite movie. I hope it stays close to the book, though.
  10. i think rachelle lefrevre should read the book! bella's supposed to work it out for herself, there's supposed to be a romantic scene at port angeles! kristen stewart said that the books were 'pretty popular' omg what cave has she been sleeping in, and edward can't run over treetops cos that would make him able to fly and the whole point of him not being able 2 fly is so the vampires break stereotypes -swallowed a dictionary- i really hate to be mean but after reading all this i'm seriously worried, the cast definitely havnt read the book.............i should trust stephenie but.....................
  11. any book or series of books that are made into movies are going to be different people. A film is the filmmakers/scriptwriter/ etc interpretation of a story. It will not be exactly like what readers see in their heads! i wish people would seriously get over the fact that such and such 'doesn't look right' or 'that doesn't happen in the book'! Filmmaking is an art - just stop complaining and let them create their artistic interpretation of steph's brilliant work. And by the way, does anyone hear the author complaining? Save your criticism and judgement until the film is out and you have actually seen it.
  12. Lady, you have no clue what you're talking about!!! there are ABSOLUTELY NO scenes in which anybody, for that matter, ends up in a tree top!!! i've read all of Stephenie Meyer's books front to back about 4 or 5 times, and NONE of them mention that, so if you ever actually decide to pick one up and read it you would know too.
  13. i'm not that upset about the jumping on treetops bit but i find it unbelievable that the cast obiously haven't read the book Rachelle says “I think that there is a scene where a character ends up in a treetop in the book,” she explained. “I don’t want to say who (ie. she doesn't know who) but there are treetop scenes in the book." there is not a scene where edward's on a treetop just a short moment and since twilight is from bella's point of view she doesn't notice that edwards watching her, so there is definitely not any treetop jumping. i don't wanna be mean and i try to have complete faith in the directors but the cast have gotta know wat they're talking about before they start all this contraversy
  14. But, for that matter, also, i think Rachelle is going to make a pretty good Victoria. she has the hair down, thats for sure!!
  15. Does anybody else keep wanting Jacob to have a bigger part? cuz i keep forgetting that he only had a minor part in twilight, but starred in eclipse and New Moon. as much as i hate jacob for hating Edward, i have to admit, im going to miss his stubbornness for this movie! :(
  16. omg i think that the two main characters are so perfect and im going to see the movie the day it comes out im soo excited!!!
  17. AHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!When are you guys gonna release an interview with Rob Pattinson????!!!!!!!!!I wanna know waht he has to say!You know the fan mail the movie something!!!ANYTHING!!!Cant you through me a bone???!!!I have read each book three times each hoping that they would give me news!!!Come on I'm going CRAZY!!!!!AHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
    P.S.
    Im not this crazy noramlly. Oh ya just wanted to say that Ive learned to ignore all the GASPAR ULLILE fans so this is for the Gas lovers: Rob is Edward.Gas is not.Rob is hot and your Gas looks like he got hit with the ugly stick when he was born.=)
  18. Treetops? There is no scene in the book involving treetops. That's bending the movie to much. I know there are going to be MANY dissapointed fans[including me] if the movie starys too far from the book. Fans expect to see what they read, not what someone else sees for them! The screenwriter should just stick to the book. Movies are never like the book. And I know that if they were then the fans and the author[in this case Stephenie Meyer] would be happier.
  19. My birthday is December 12
  20. OMG it doesn't matter if a treetop scene is specifically found in the books. Just running across the forest the entire time is not enough for something you actually see, cause in the book your in her head, while in a movie you just see it happen. I CANNOT WAIT. Kristen, Robert, Rachelle, and ALL of them will be awesome from what I can see!
  21. i'm not fond of the treetop idea i think it strays way too far.

    The first scene in twilight where Bella is on edwards back and they're "flying" through the trees it doesn't say one thing about flying through tree 'tops' it just depicts that he was running from their meadow with her on his back extremely fast paced so much so that it seemed they were flying not that they actually were flying, it was meant to be him showing her how he gets around.

    They're straying too far from the book.
    blegh.
  22. My previous comment is not to say that i don't think they've done wonderfully with the casting though my depiction of Edward didn't get filled.
    =( I had a much different picture in my mind. But i think they casted fantastically. And i'm adoring everything they've been doing so far.

    And i love that it may be a series and not just one movie i've been obsessing, my boyfriend would tell you i'm hopelessly addicted i've read twilight i can proudly say a total of 7 times now
    and i've read New Moon a total of 4 times now, and As for Eclipse i only got the pleasure of reading that once but on the Stephenie Meyer page i loved reading from Edwards point of view and i hope she makes a book for that and i'm beyond excited for breaking dawn.

    I love everything about the serious and i am as some would call it hopelessly obsessed and addicted.

    So just for clarification. It's only those scenes that are bothering me because there's nothing about treetops in the book.
  23. In the third book, Edward throws Victoria and she slams into a tree. As mad as edward was I suppose sh landed in the upper part of the tree. What does it matter anyway. I cant wait to see it!! By the way, all the actors casted are beautiful.
  24. Geez... the controversy surrounding one little comment is ridiculous! Get over it people. Rachelle made a mistake when she said that, or she interpreted the scene differently then most of us. Big deal. How much of a difference does it really make if he's in the tree tops, or on the ground. They didn't say that he'd be flying, he'd be running in the branches most likely. It's obvious that he can jump because that's how he gets in Bella's window. As long as they stick closely to the books, I'm perfectly fine with that scene. I'm looking forward to seeing the movie! I honestly can't wait! I've read the twilight series several times now, and I can't wait to see it on the movie screen. I'll be ecstatic as long as they don't give us another Eragon fiasco. That movie absolutely masacred the book. Christopher Poalini probably hasn't stopped having nightmares about it yet. And yes, I know that I can't spell his last name. Anyway, despite all of the complaints, I'm sure that every true Twi-hard fan will see that movie when it comes out. And I'm sure that the producers will do their best to stick to the book because they're probably afraid of the revolt the fans will start if they don't. Nothing's scarier than a bunch of disappointed Twilight crazed people. And on a last note, I love the cast that they picked! Rob Pattinson is so hot!
  25. Like most people have said, the only thing that bothers me is the possible expulsion of the Port Angeles scene, which is personally my favorite--aside from Confessions, of course. Another negative that keeps nagging at me is this idea of Edward revealing the secrets to her. In the book, part of Bella's character is her perceptiveness, her keen observations. She is actually the one who discovers the secret.

    But, aside from that, I'm very much looking forward to the movie. All of the cast looks amazing, I must say [oh, and Robert Pattinson? Gotta love him.] And by now I've somewhat gotten used to book-to-movie adaptations, as I've had to put up with the Harry Potter films...haha

    I can't wait until this winter!
  26. I think that she will make a pretty good Victoria! she wasn't bad as stacy in Big Wolf on Campus!

    i cant wait for the movie to come out!! i hope that the movie stays close to the book! i would sooo love to see the tree top scene's and see how those come out!! ^__^
  27. Okay I know everyone is saying that its obvious that the cast members didnt read the books but some of them did like Ashley Greene(I think)and an interview with Twilight Moms shows that Peter(Carlisle)has at least looked at the first eleven chapters so dont blame Rachelles...unacurateness?
    on the whole cast please.Oh ya MTV peoples when are you guys gonna release an interview with the following:
    Robert Pattinson
    Ashley Greene
    Jakson Rathbone
    Elizabeth Reaser
    Kellan Lutz
    and Peter Facinelli?
  28. I love the books, and I think that we have to accept that the film will inevitably be different. We should be able appreciate it for what it is.
  29. im so excited for this movie to come out(:
  30. Don't read this if you haven't read Eclipse! The only treetop scene I remember is when Edward throws Victoria up into the tree right before she's killed. I don't know if it's a treetop, though. But who cares? The actors look just like I pictured them...it's gonna be awesome!
  31. To confirm the annoying remarks about trees, i just re-read Twilight for like the 6 or 7th time, and i FIRMLY FORCE YOU TO BELEIVE that their is indeed no tree scenes...at least, not in the trees. Oh, i didnt know we were called Twi-hards either! oh well, happy lala land day fellow Twi-hards!
  32. OMG!!! I am so upset!!! TREE TOPS? WTF?!?!!?
    They're ruining it.
  33. At first I admit I was angry over the changing of the story. I don't think that it has to be just like the book. I am just worried that the producers are getting a bit carried away with their love of special effects action. I have seen it done wrong all too often. By the way, The only person who has ever been on top of a tree was Jacob Black when he tries to get Bella to guess the truth about him being a werewolf. And even then he wasn't very graceful in the tree. However, I am looking forward to seeing Robert play as Edward. Yet I find that after thinking things through, the producers are most likely hopeing that everyone else(Bella included and excluding a few of the Cullens) will scrape by as the characters. I don't want to see anymore bull about "acting first" and "looks second". There are certain movies that call for a specific cast.
  34. Ok so I do beleive that some of that in inaccurate... like actually being in then treetops (unless I just dont remember that...?
    ) but who cares?! the movie is going to be amazing is there is NO WAY the movie could be exactly as the book was written, it just isn't plausible.
  35. FIRST I'd like to say OMG! I absolutely love this book so it would depress me for weeks if they %@#*? it up. If you are going to take a peice of litterature that someone put years of hard work into and make it a movie out of it, it should be as close to the book as possible. So far the only problem I have with the movie, which happens to be a big problem, is Edward. Enough said.
  36. im sorry but this is sounding so far off. there is no tree top running. in any of the three books, there is alot of runnin throught the forest, but omg im scared to see the movie im too much of a fan of the book. im sure it will still be good, just no where near.
  37. Okay. I know that Edward was supposedly in the tree when Bella was reading her book in the sun, but how does that link to jumping from branch to branch whilst carrying a human?
    So he sits in trees. Many humans do that.
    How does that translate to jumping from tree to tree? It doesn't seem like a very Edward-esque thing to do. I mean, Edward is old-fashioned, right? And during the entire three books, he never purposely shows off his heightened senses in a way like that.
    Yes, he broke a thick branch. Yes, he ran around the meadow in a half-second. Yes, he ran really fast to her truck. But he never openly showed them off like that scene suggests. In the book, he did the first two to show Bella just how dangerous he was. And like he said, when he ran her to her truck, he was showing her how he traveled.
    I just really don't think that that scene accurately represents Edward's character.
    Maybe it's just me, but it's what I think.
  38. i agree with everyone that is telling people to stop whining. does anyone else remember that harry potter movies? they cut lots out of those movies, they changed side plots, characters, and totally skipped over some scenes. those movies were still awesome. the 5th was my personal favorite and they left out half the freakin prophecy. it was still an awesome movie. from what i hear, this movie is going to be extremely accurate, and i can't wait.

    plus, we might have pictured it, but these immiortal vampires. how accurate can our dipicitons of them get...its gonna be different than what we expect no matter what.
  39. Anyone ever think that maybe it's easier to film ABOVE treetops than THROUGH them? They aren't just accomadating our personal visions of the books. There's budgets and cameras and the cast and the crew and a whole bunch of stuff they need to consider when adapting a book to a movie. So just be happy it's happening at all, y'know?

    I'm behind the cast and crew a thousand percent, and I'm thrilled they decided to honor Stephenie Meyer and her story on the silver screen. So bring on the treetops; I can't wait.
  40. I would like to start out with a heartfelt you guys have way too much time on your hands. I love twillight as much as the next romance/vampire genre psycopath fan does. However, i think its a little silly that people are fighting over how true a fan you are or how many times youv'e read the book. BTW, I'VE READ IT MORE TIMES THAN ALL OF YOU) (23 times at least) So have fun arguing about trees while I read your hilarious arguments and rofl while my friend photoshops hayden christensen photos. YAY I CAN'T WAIT UNTIL THE MOVIE BECAUSE THE TREETOP SCENE IS JUST GOING TO BE SICK AWESOMENESS!
  41. "Heightened"? What on earth needs to be "heightened" about Twilight?
    How the hey can she be telling us to cool it and let crap like this slide (and yes, it is absoulte crap. The clearing scene was my favorite scene in Twilight. Even if it wasn't yours, you all have to admit it was fantastic. I hope you all realize this will be taking its place. "Demonstration"? Remember when Edward showed her his abilities in the clearing?) when she can't even correctly cite the book. Why on earth would they want to mess with a book that can translate perfectly into any director/writer/actor/VIEWER's dream? They need to realize that this book has a momentous fan base. No matter what, I will go see this in theaters, but if they ~*?@~ it all up, they ahd better not expect me to buy it on DVD, get any of the merch, or watch the next one. They need to get some respect for their audience. We're the frekaing consumers!! Shouldn't we be getting what we want?
  42. Im fine with the whole tree hopping scene, I just hope that they have it not be a total suprise to Bella, she knows alot when Edward tells her.
    The movie sounds like it will be great, I cannot wait for the movie and the next book! Great job (if any cast member is reading this)
    Love it!
  43. %#?%#@#@. theres never a scene where theyre in the tree tops. Edward runs really fast, he doesnt ?%*$#~# fly!
  44. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! i love you all a bushel and a peck but....whoa there! CHILL! I'm not even going to mention Tr__ T-ps...they seem to be some sort of an attack world. HAVE FUN SQUABBLING, my children. AAHHHHHH...so excited for twilight!!
  45. OMG, i am happy they are making a movie! I almost cried when i finished the book!! I cant wait 4 the next one!!
  46. i think the tree top scenes can be cool they just need to be done very well. but there definitely was not a tree top running scene in the book - this chick playing victoria seems pretty cool and down to earth though with a genuine respect for vampires and all that their existence represents. personally i recommend she read the book, if she hasnt, regardless because its a masterpiece. as long as she can act the script and really be victoria, its all good.
  47. I have to say that im a little upset with this whole "Tree Top" thing!! Its not in the book and its not waht the master 'Stephenie' wrote. Usually i wouldnt be complaining about this sort of thing because i like it when directors give there own twist to a movie because it gives it more of a pazzaz but im worried that if they do have a tree top scene the movie is going to becom e "One of those vampire movies". The ones that everyone laugh about and no one wants to go see because it to fake.
    Well there you go thats my two sence, i hope i havent offended any of the actors or the director by saying this because i am very proud of you all for taking on such a big project :)
  48. oh my goodness. please, if any single soul from summit is reading this,

    DO. NOT. SKIP. THE. PORT. ANGELES. SCENE.

    PLEASE!!!!!!!!! don't #?*?# up the movie! there are no treetop scenes! whfjwehg!! ack. please don't make disgusting stupid hollywood vampires. AHHHHHHH.
  49. this whole treetop thing had better be jumping from treetop to treetop and not just running over the twigs, cos that would be way too original chronicles of narnia.
  50. Okay, so the last sentence in the article was, "So, twi-hards: What do you think?
    First of all, who said we were called Twi-Hards? What kind of a name is that anyway? It makes us all sound like emo-screamos. Anyhoo, if there actually were treetop scenes in the book, why didn't Stephenie describe them at all? That DOES NOT make any sense. All I can ask of the producers, directors, and the screenwriters most importantly, PLEASE PLEASE don't change the movie TOO much from the book. If you want to change a scene from the book, because it would take too long to film or whatever, JUST DO IT. Because its THE BOOK that we love, and if you guys change it, so will our feelings. (for Twilight)
    So please just keep that in mind, Catherine Hardwicke, and whoever the screenwriters are!

Pages: « 15 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 1516 »